<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>e-space Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2173/4178</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:25:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-26T01:25:22Z</dc:date>
    
    <item>
      <title>Forget the transnational state</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92098</link>
      <description>Title: Forget the transnational state
Authors: Cammack, Paul
Abstract: This paper offers a critique of the ideas of the “transnational capitalist class” and “transnational state” advanced by William Robinson. It argues that the concepts and their theoretical underpinning are fundamentally flawed, and therefore that the idea of the “transnational state” should be abandoned. (pp. 79–97)
Description: Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published in Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, published by and copyright Addleton Academic Publishers.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92098</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why are some people better off than others?</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92082</link>
      <description>Title: Why are some people better off than others?
Authors: Cammack, Paul
Abstract: High and rising levels of inequality in much of the world are shown to stem from neoliberal reform, and to be particularly acute in the United States and the UK. Three approaches to understanding this are compared: liberal globalism, global developmentalism, and historical materialism. In line with the third of these, rising inequality is explained in terms of a shift in power from labour to capital.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92082</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smart power and US leadership: a critique of Joseph Nye</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92097</link>
      <description>Title: Smart power and US leadership: a critique of Joseph Nye
Authors: Cammack, Paul
Abstract: This paper subjects Joseph Nye’s advocacy of soft power (recently repackaged as ‘smart’ power) to critical scrutiny, and reflects on the implications for US global leadership. It shows that Nye’s position is far from multilateralist, still insisting as it does on hard power supremacy and the need for America to lead. It then argues that the case made is weak, both in theory (because of a misuse of collective action theory) and&#xD;
in practice (because of the evidence he himself provides that America is unable to provide constructive, co-operative leadership). It concludes that the best contribution that America could make to global stability would be to relinquish the claim to leadership, not only in cases where it is at odds with the international community, or widely seen as itself the source of instability, but particularly in cases where shared perspectives regarding&#xD;
common goals and approaches do exist.
Description: Full-text of this article is available at http://www.49thparallel.bham.ac.uk/back/issue22/1_Cammack.pdf</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92097</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Poverty, policy and the politics of competitiveness</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92081</link>
      <description>Title: Poverty, policy and the politics of competitiveness
Authors: Cammack, Paul
Abstract: There is a consensus among global governing elites and international institutions on policies appropriate for the alleviation of poverty. It centres on the restructuring of social institutions and relations to enhance competitiveness. The OECD, the World Bank, the UNDP and the UK are presented as examples.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92081</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

