Smart power and US leadership: a critique of Joseph Nye

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92097
Title:
Smart power and US leadership: a critique of Joseph Nye
Authors:
Cammack, Paul
Citation:
49th Parallel, 2008, no. 22
Publisher:
University of Birmingham
Issue Date:
2008
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/2173/92097
Additional Links:
http://www.49thparallel.bham.ac.uk/back/issue22/index.htm; http://www.49thparallel.bham.ac.uk/back/issue22/1_Cammack.pdf
Submitted date:
2010-02
Abstract:
This paper subjects Joseph Nye’s advocacy of soft power (recently repackaged as ‘smart’ power) to critical scrutiny, and reflects on the implications for US global leadership. It shows that Nye’s position is far from multilateralist, still insisting as it does on hard power supremacy and the need for America to lead. It then argues that the case made is weak, both in theory (because of a misuse of collective action theory) and in practice (because of the evidence he himself provides that America is unable to provide constructive, co-operative leadership). It concludes that the best contribution that America could make to global stability would be to relinquish the claim to leadership, not only in cases where it is at odds with the international community, or widely seen as itself the source of instability, but particularly in cases where shared perspectives regarding common goals and approaches do exist.
Type:
Article
Language:
en
Description:
Full-text of this article is available at http://www.49thparallel.bham.ac.uk/back/issue22/1_Cammack.pdf
Keywords:
United States; Leadership; Soft power; Smart power
ISSN:
1793-5794

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorCammack, Paulen
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-15T12:00:44Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-15T12:00:44Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.date.submitted2010-02-
dc.identifier.citation49th Parallel, 2008, no. 22en
dc.identifier.issn1793-5794-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2173/92097-
dc.descriptionFull-text of this article is available at http://www.49thparallel.bham.ac.uk/back/issue22/1_Cammack.pdfen
dc.description.abstractThis paper subjects Joseph Nye’s advocacy of soft power (recently repackaged as ‘smart’ power) to critical scrutiny, and reflects on the implications for US global leadership. It shows that Nye’s position is far from multilateralist, still insisting as it does on hard power supremacy and the need for America to lead. It then argues that the case made is weak, both in theory (because of a misuse of collective action theory) and in practice (because of the evidence he himself provides that America is unable to provide constructive, co-operative leadership). It concludes that the best contribution that America could make to global stability would be to relinquish the claim to leadership, not only in cases where it is at odds with the international community, or widely seen as itself the source of instability, but particularly in cases where shared perspectives regarding common goals and approaches do exist.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Birminghamen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.49thparallel.bham.ac.uk/back/issue22/index.htmen
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.49thparallel.bham.ac.uk/back/issue22/1_Cammack.pdfen
dc.subjectUnited Statesen
dc.subjectLeadershipen
dc.subjectSoft poweren
dc.subjectSmart poweren
dc.titleSmart power and US leadership: a critique of Joseph Nyeen
dc.typeArticleen
All Items in e-space are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.